<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Search Engine Optimization Blog - SEM News &amp; Opinion - David Ogletree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ogletreeseo.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com</link>
	<description>If you think it&#039;s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur - Red Adair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Digg submission process does not like MS ASP.NET by gallery804</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/189.html/comment-page-1#comment-87727</link>
		<dc:creator>gallery804</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/189.html#comment-87727</guid>
		<description>It seems a nice blog,Thank you for sharing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a nice blog,Thank you for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beware of calls from &#8220;Today&#8217;s Business Report&#8221; It is a scam by ogletree</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/399.html/comment-page-1#comment-87724</link>
		<dc:creator>ogletree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/?p=399#comment-87724</guid>
		<description>I use spam karma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use spam karma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keyword Rich URL&#8217;s are not necessary &#8211; Don&#8217;t Change! by Dale Palsson</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/235.html/comment-page-1#comment-87653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Palsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/?p=235#comment-87653</guid>
		<description>If you think that just naming your site with a keyword rich name is going to do the trick, then just keep looking for that magic bullet.  Google is always looking for rich content, relevant content, and real content.  More people would be more successful if they focused on delivering on those things that their target market or customer want.  A keyword rich URL will help, but it will not do all the heavy lifting for you.  

Dale Palsson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think that just naming your site with a keyword rich name is going to do the trick, then just keep looking for that magic bullet.  Google is always looking for rich content, relevant content, and real content.  More people would be more successful if they focused on delivering on those things that their target market or customer want.  A keyword rich URL will help, but it will not do all the heavy lifting for you.  </p>
<p>Dale Palsson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Link Building Tips by Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/419.html/comment-page-1#comment-87644</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/?p=419#comment-87644</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also worth mentioning that &#039;do follow&#039; links are also very important from a link building point of view. Nice list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also worth mentioning that &#8216;do follow&#8217; links are also very important from a link building point of view. Nice list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beware of calls from &#8220;Today&#8217;s Business Report&#8221; It is a scam by asics</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/399.html/comment-page-1#comment-87626</link>
		<dc:creator>asics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/?p=399#comment-87626</guid>
		<description>i read your weblog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering
 if you get lots of spam comments? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can advise? 
 I get so much lately it is driving me mad so any assistance is really much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i read your weblog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering<br />
 if you get lots of spam comments? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can advise?<br />
 I get so much lately it is driving me mad so any assistance is really much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finding Links by Studying your Competitors by virbam</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/361.html/comment-page-1#comment-87386</link>
		<dc:creator>virbam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/?p=361#comment-87386</guid>
		<description>Links from Forums and Blogs

About the point ,I think that  we should found some high PR of blogs or forums ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links from Forums and Blogs</p>
<p>About the point ,I think that  we should found some high PR of blogs or forums ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Is Stumbleupon is their traffic worth getting? by Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/144.html/comment-page-1#comment-87187</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/144.html#comment-87187</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not getting anything out of it. I can&#039;t even &quot;stumble&quot;- if I do I cant get out of their site and I can&#039;t vote up or down-nothing. Pretty worthless. There should be a step-by-step process to make sure you know what your doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not getting anything out of it. I can&#8217;t even &#8220;stumble&#8221;- if I do I cant get out of their site and I can&#8217;t vote up or down-nothing. Pretty worthless. There should be a step-by-step process to make sure you know what your doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Google Trends in Excel to compare years by SearchCap: The Day In Search, July 2, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/434.html/comment-page-1#comment-86996</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, July 2, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/?p=434#comment-86996</guid>
		<description>[...] Using Google Trends in Excel to compare years, Ogletree [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Using Google Trends in Excel to compare years, Ogletree [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Is Stumbleupon is their traffic worth getting? by Registered Nurse Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/144.html/comment-page-1#comment-86970</link>
		<dc:creator>Registered Nurse Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/144.html#comment-86970</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your experience.

I read on another blog about using StumbleUpon traffic, and I was googling some experiences (that is how I came across this post).

I appreciate you breaking down how it worked. I am sure the vistors may behave differently depending on the site, and I will definitely try it. $0.05 per click isn&#039;t all that bad really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your experience.</p>
<p>I read on another blog about using StumbleUpon traffic, and I was googling some experiences (that is how I came across this post).</p>
<p>I appreciate you breaking down how it worked. I am sure the vistors may behave differently depending on the site, and I will definitely try it. $0.05 per click isn&#8217;t all that bad really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Needs to Remove Wikipedia From the Index by Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/131.html/comment-page-1#comment-86960</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/131.html#comment-86960</guid>
		<description>You are such a gibbon.  I wonder if you still think this?  Here&#039;s a wake-up call for you - there are incorrect facts in every encyclopedia and every newspaper that ever existed.  The difference is that Wikipedia generally tries to provide references and warn users where no reference exists.  At least it&#039;s honest about it&#039;s deficiencies.

Teachers need to take the opportunity to teach kids to be sceptical about *every* source - not just Wikipedia.  Sometimes the information you get is right, sometimes it contains mistakes and sometimes it&#039;s deliberate lies through and through.  Welcome to the world.

Of course that doesn&#039;t mean Wikipedia isn&#039;t an incredibly useful tool for communicating, and it doesn&#039;t mean Google should treat it any differently than it treats all websites - fairly.  The only people that whinge about it are those that want to blindly accept everything they read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are such a gibbon.  I wonder if you still think this?  Here&#8217;s a wake-up call for you &#8211; there are incorrect facts in every encyclopedia and every newspaper that ever existed.  The difference is that Wikipedia generally tries to provide references and warn users where no reference exists.  At least it&#8217;s honest about it&#8217;s deficiencies.</p>
<p>Teachers need to take the opportunity to teach kids to be sceptical about *every* source &#8211; not just Wikipedia.  Sometimes the information you get is right, sometimes it contains mistakes and sometimes it&#8217;s deliberate lies through and through.  Welcome to the world.</p>
<p>Of course that doesn&#8217;t mean Wikipedia isn&#8217;t an incredibly useful tool for communicating, and it doesn&#8217;t mean Google should treat it any differently than it treats all websites &#8211; fairly.  The only people that whinge about it are those that want to blindly accept everything they read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
