10.26.07
Google Analytics Connection Speed stat
I have been working a lot with Google analytics a lot lately and I like it a lot. Before I used it I had asked some friends what percentage of their site visitors were dial up. They gave me these real low numbers like 3-5%. I thought that was real low. Specially in the niche they were in. Now that I have my own stats I see the same numbers. Right now I have 5.32% dail up users and 63.5% broadband. The rest goes to unknown. When you have 27% unknown those numbers are almost worthless. I would imagine that all broadband providers are known so there is very good chance those are dial up. Also T1 users could be dail up. Anybody can start an ISP with a t1 and some modems. These numbers are pretty much worthless.
Technorati Tags: google, google analytics, analytics, dial up, isp, internet, dsl, broadband
Stumble it!
Cheap Web Hosting said,
11.25.07 at 11:10 am
I agree, the big unknown percentage makes the data pretty much useless. Unless they get more info to lower the “unknown” percentage this bit of their stats won’t be very valuable.
Naja said,
11.29.07 at 2:16 pm
So you actually like Google Analytics even though for this data it’s not helping you? Are there other features you like? I haven’t liked it much either, so I was just wondering.
Cheap Web Hosting said,
12.05.07 at 4:59 am
Correct! I like it except for the connection data where I recently got about 30% unknown again. So that is not very meaningful. I just find it confusing how different the results from AwStats, Webalizer and Analytics are when you compare them. Quite significant in terms of percentages across key metrics like uniques and impressions.
Small Business SEO - Terry Reeves said,
12.10.07 at 2:11 pm
The unknowns come from Firefox browsers and users that have java scripts turned off. This number will continue to rise as more and more people are using Firefox.
Also. I personally do not believe the low percentages of people reported using dial up. I have an observation of my own. Recently I had issues with my DSL. The connection speed became extremely slow due to a network problem. It would literally take a minute or two for the web pages to load on come sites. Looking at the status bar, I think I found the culprit. On the pages/sites that took the longest to load, it was the urchinTracker.js in the status bar that seemed to be holding up the page load.
So, I bet if you are on dial up and that same script causes your surfing to stop, you do what I did and you back out and look elsewhere.
Just a thought.
minvestment said,
12.18.07 at 2:58 pm
I have 40% dialup users, shows how far behind India is since most my traffic is from India
Ernst said,
03.13.08 at 9:22 am
Still 5% dial-up is high. In the Netherlands providers are ceasing the dial-up service.
As for the 27% unknows; I think that is broadband too. So focus for your analytics on the broadband users.
As for firefox, it has not a 27% coverage among the browsers, so that can’t explain the 27%.
ogletree said,
03.13.08 at 9:49 am
I am only talking about the US market since that is all I know about. I understand that other countries have more people on broadband. US is still very behind. All major providers are known and it is hard for somebody to become their own broadband provider. It is very easy to become a dial up provider. I still believe the vast majority of the unknown is dial up.
One other point is that when you talk about dail up % there are 2 things to consider. One number is how many people have dial up and how many have broadband. The other is how often each is used. A ton of people may have dial up but they probably don’t use it for much. Some people will do most their browsing at work because their connection at home is so bad.
Link Builder said,
04.01.08 at 6:18 am
Is Google Analytics accurate??? can you give me some example in how you will know that your site is visited? in the other hand thus blog comments help raise your percentage in google analytics?
Old Hat SEO said,
04.04.08 at 9:39 pm
A bigger problem I find with the free Google product is it’s inability to account for the majority of the visitors to the sites I have and monitor. Using server stat readers, I have a very accurate measure of literally every visitor to any site I maintain. Comparing this data to what Google reports shows that GA is missing or not reporting as much as 30% of site visitors over a number of websites.
I guess you get what you pay for.
ogletree said,
04.06.08 at 6:52 pm
There is no accurate method of analytics. Every program has a flaw. You just have to learn how to read them. GA has issues because it uses javascript. They may also be doing some things to make the data more accurate. You need to learn about different types of traffic. When I take somebodies analytics and filter out all the junk people tend to get kind of upset that I took away traffic. Most people don’t realize that so much of that traffic is junk. There are so many bots out there right now. There are also a lot of humans that function like bots and that traffic is trash as well. If your not heavily filtering your reports you don’t have accurate numbers.