<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Analytics Connection Speed stat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html</link>
	<description>If you think it&#039;s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur - Red Adair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gift hampers</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-76186</link>
		<dc:creator>gift hampers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-76186</guid>
		<description>Google Analytics s the best stat counter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Analytics s the best stat counter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Gibbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-72055</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Gibbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-72055</guid>
		<description>We are using Google analytics to better understand performance assoicated with ExperienceLA.com, the ExperienceLA Blog, and the entry pages for ExperienceLA WiFi.  We operate a 16 block public WiFi district in Downtown Los Angeles.  With 98% of the connection speed for the WiFi entry page shows as &quot;Unknown&quot;, whereas on ExperienceLA.com, the &quot;Unkown is around 20%.  ExperienceLA.com has a lot of local content, and we think we have higher traffic from mobile devices than most web destinations.
 
Anyway, &quot;Unkn own&quot; is a great indicator of mobile devices on ones webpages.  In google analystics, you can also see exact stats for iphones and other mobile devices.  I suspect that the comment above above java being turned off would apply to wireless devices and help expain this stat.

Would like to hear other comments with regard to Unknown Connection speed and mobile devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are using Google analytics to better understand performance assoicated with ExperienceLA.com, the ExperienceLA Blog, and the entry pages for ExperienceLA WiFi.  We operate a 16 block public WiFi district in Downtown Los Angeles.  With 98% of the connection speed for the WiFi entry page shows as &#8220;Unknown&#8221;, whereas on ExperienceLA.com, the &#8220;Unkown is around 20%.  ExperienceLA.com has a lot of local content, and we think we have higher traffic from mobile devices than most web destinations.</p>
<p>Anyway, &#8220;Unkn own&#8221; is a great indicator of mobile devices on ones webpages.  In google analystics, you can also see exact stats for iphones and other mobile devices.  I suspect that the comment above above java being turned off would apply to wireless devices and help expain this stat.</p>
<p>Would like to hear other comments with regard to Unknown Connection speed and mobile devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Design Sussex</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-69632</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Design Sussex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 18:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-69632</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post on Analytics - to follow up to my previous comment, I researched and found out that it is done by IP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post on Analytics &#8211; to follow up to my previous comment, I researched and found out that it is done by IP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horsham Web Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-68746</link>
		<dc:creator>Horsham Web Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-68746</guid>
		<description>Surely this can&#039;t be that accurate though, how would it be able to tell what kind of connection everybody is on?

If it worked by download speed then it wouldn&#039;t be accurate and if it went by IP address then wouldn&#039;t it require the ISPs to release information on every IP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely this can&#8217;t be that accurate though, how would it be able to tell what kind of connection everybody is on?</p>
<p>If it worked by download speed then it wouldn&#8217;t be accurate and if it went by IP address then wouldn&#8217;t it require the ISPs to release information on every IP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Optimisation</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-66239</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Optimisation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 09:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-66239</guid>
		<description>I apprecate your comment. The paid review you submitted in ReviewMe, actually asked for a review of the home page, so I have my honest first looks. I would still be interested to learn more about your affiliate tracking software, but that still isn&#039;t an active link on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I apprecate your comment. The paid review you submitted in ReviewMe, actually asked for a review of the home page, so I have my honest first looks. I would still be interested to learn more about your affiliate tracking software, but that still isn&#8217;t an active link on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo expert</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-66231</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-66231</guid>
		<description>Great post. Blogs are a very natural way to attract links. I’d love to see a post on how to get your company to blog. Particularly if you are dealing with a large, conservative company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Blogs are a very natural way to attract links. I’d love to see a post on how to get your company to blog. Particularly if you are dealing with a large, conservative company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-64905</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-64905</guid>
		<description>Google Analytics, it really helps a lot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Analytics, it really helps a lot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogletree</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-55234</link>
		<dc:creator>ogletree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-55234</guid>
		<description>There is no accurate method of analytics.  Every program has a flaw.  You just have to learn how to read them.  GA has issues because it uses javascript.  They may also be doing some things to make the data more accurate.  You need to learn about different types of traffic.  When I take somebodies analytics and filter out all the junk people tend to get kind of upset that I took away traffic.  Most people don&#039;t realize that so much of that traffic is junk.  There are so many bots out there right now.  There are also a lot of humans that function like bots and that traffic is trash as well.  If your not heavily filtering your reports you don&#039;t have accurate numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no accurate method of analytics.  Every program has a flaw.  You just have to learn how to read them.  GA has issues because it uses javascript.  They may also be doing some things to make the data more accurate.  You need to learn about different types of traffic.  When I take somebodies analytics and filter out all the junk people tend to get kind of upset that I took away traffic.  Most people don&#8217;t realize that so much of that traffic is junk.  There are so many bots out there right now.  There are also a lot of humans that function like bots and that traffic is trash as well.  If your not heavily filtering your reports you don&#8217;t have accurate numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Hat SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-54939</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Hat SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-54939</guid>
		<description>A bigger problem I find with the free Google product is it&#039;s inability to account for the majority of the visitors to the sites I have and monitor. Using server stat readers, I have a very accurate measure of literally every visitor to any site I maintain. Comparing this data to what Google reports shows that GA is missing or not reporting as much as 30% of site visitors over a number of websites.

I guess you get what you pay for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bigger problem I find with the free Google product is it&#8217;s inability to account for the majority of the visitors to the sites I have and monitor. Using server stat readers, I have a very accurate measure of literally every visitor to any site I maintain. Comparing this data to what Google reports shows that GA is missing or not reporting as much as 30% of site visitors over a number of websites.</p>
<p>I guess you get what you pay for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Builder</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html/comment-page-1#comment-53481</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/188.html#comment-53481</guid>
		<description>Is Google Analytics accurate??? can you give me some example in how you will know that your site is visited? in the other hand thus blog comments help raise your percentage in google analytics?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Google Analytics accurate??? can you give me some example in how you will know that your site is visited? in the other hand thus blog comments help raise your percentage in google analytics?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
