<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is CSS still not widely used for page layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html</link>
	<description>Expert advice on search engine optimization</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web design service india</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-64326</link>
		<dc:creator>Web design service india</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-64326</guid>
		<description>Hi

I think this is because of lack of knowledge over CSS.

Interesting article.
Thanks for sharing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I think this is because of lack of knowledge over CSS.</p>
<p>Interesting article.<br />
Thanks for sharing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing and Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-21955</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing and Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-21955</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Internet Marketing and Advertising...&lt;/strong&gt;

I couldn't understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Internet Marketing and Advertising&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t understand some parts of this article, but it sounds interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sura</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3497</link>
		<dc:creator>Sura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3497</guid>
		<description>I think the reason people dont use CSS is becasue of a lack oh knowledge. They simply dont know how to create it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason people dont use CSS is becasue of a lack oh knowledge. They simply dont know how to create it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus941</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>markus941</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 22:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>I agree - whenever I find a site that's still in tables it makes me think less of the designer or the site. Get with the times, people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - whenever I find a site that&#8217;s still in tables it makes me think less of the designer or the site. Get with the times, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Young</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3186</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 06:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3186</guid>
		<description>In reality, CSS layouts/designs are not difficult. They can get a little complex, but that's only for advanced stuff and anything can be complex when you get to a certain level. Simple or basic CSS layouts are much less problematic than the same thing in tables and simpler to debug. Oh yeah, and they do save a bit o' bandwidth. I think the greatest thing about CSS layouts, is how easy it is to slowly expand it into something more complicated and beautiful. Try expanding a table'd design and you get all these weird nested tables that take a lot of time to work up or a lot of time to debug. That's been my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reality, CSS layouts/designs are not difficult. They can get a little complex, but that&#8217;s only for advanced stuff and anything can be complex when you get to a certain level. Simple or basic CSS layouts are much less problematic than the same thing in tables and simpler to debug. Oh yeah, and they do save a bit o&#8217; bandwidth. I think the greatest thing about CSS layouts, is how easy it is to slowly expand it into something more complicated and beautiful. Try expanding a table&#8217;d design and you get all these weird nested tables that take a lot of time to work up or a lot of time to debug. That&#8217;s been my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graywolf</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>graywolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 04:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/140.html#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>I wonder the same thing too, but the biggest reason I get is the lack of absolute precision of layout with css. With tables and images you have absolute control of the end result much like a printed magazine page. With CSS browser issues and CSS hacks get used and the end result ends up a little different. The CEO gets "annoyed" that the rest of the world doesn't see exactly the same thing as he does, so to solve the problem we end up with images and table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder the same thing too, but the biggest reason I get is the lack of absolute precision of layout with css. With tables and images you have absolute control of the end result much like a printed magazine page. With CSS browser issues and CSS hacks get used and the end result ends up a little different. The CEO gets &#8220;annoyed&#8221; that the rest of the world doesn&#8217;t see exactly the same thing as he does, so to solve the problem we end up with images and table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
