<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Accessible Search For the Blind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ogletreeseo.com/116.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/116.html</link>
	<description>If you think it&#039;s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur - Red Adair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:17:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Wilks</title>
		<link>http://www.ogletreeseo.com/116.html#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ogletreeseo.com/116.html#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I had no idea you were leagally blind, I have been reading you posts over at WMW for years. I usually think about screenreaders when I am doing SEO as it helps me describe the page and remember what I am actually doing (apart from passing off hidden links as accessability ;-) ) I really believe seo and accessability go hand in hand.

This latest Google search has me very interested. I do a fair amount of consulting and seo work in the travel area and it&#039;s usually spammed like no tomorrow. Anyway long story short, my dad has a great content site that mostly gets lost in the algo these days and it ranks where it should in this accessable search which I thought was interesting. The results for most of the local travel listings in my area are the best I have ever seen.

I am sure we will see some of the &#039;quality&#039; factors from this algo come across into the regular Google Algo. That would be really nice! I think the head of the project is really onto something other are missing in the algo.

Cheers,
Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I had no idea you were leagally blind, I have been reading you posts over at WMW for years. I usually think about screenreaders when I am doing SEO as it helps me describe the page and remember what I am actually doing (apart from passing off hidden links as accessability <img src='http://www.ogletreeseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) I really believe seo and accessability go hand in hand.</p>
<p>This latest Google search has me very interested. I do a fair amount of consulting and seo work in the travel area and it&#8217;s usually spammed like no tomorrow. Anyway long story short, my dad has a great content site that mostly gets lost in the algo these days and it ranks where it should in this accessable search which I thought was interesting. The results for most of the local travel listings in my area are the best I have ever seen.</p>
<p>I am sure we will see some of the &#8216;quality&#8217; factors from this algo come across into the regular Google Algo. That would be really nice! I think the head of the project is really onto something other are missing in the algo.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

